Look Before You Leap: Why You Need To Conduct a Thorough Trademark Search Before Building Your Practice's Brand

Timothy Oliver • July 27, 2022

Your dental practice isn’t the only one in town, far from it. In order to start, build, or grow your practice, you need to distinguish it from all of the other options that potential patients may be considering. You can provide the best patient experience, offer the best dental care, and ask existing patients to sing your praises on review sites or elsewhere. All of these are, of course, foundational for any successful practice. But if you truly want to raise your practice’s profile and build awareness among consumers, establishing a distinct, creative, and memorable “brand” is indispensable. And the centerpieces of any brand are a name and/or a logo, both of which constitute trademarks.

 

For a dental practice, a strong trademarked name or logo can become one of its most valuable assets. But if you aren’t careful when branding your practice, and your brand is substantially similar to an existing trademark held by another practice or even a business in a separate field, that valuable asset can quickly become a costly liability.

 

Imagine that you’ve invested thousands of dollars and hours building consumer knowledge of your practice’s brand only to discover that your name or logo is substantially similar to a name or logo another practice in your area has been using for years. Not only may you lose your rights to use your name and logo, but you will also have to spend significant sums defending yourself from infringement claims and may even have to pay damages to the aggrieved party. This is why it is so important to first invest in due diligence, such as a complete trademark search, before proceeding with any branding effort.

 

Conversely, you wouldn’t want another practice infringing upon or diluting the strength of your established trademark by using the same or similar marks for their practice. By conducting a full trademark search before you adopt a brand and then registering your marks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), you can both avoid infringing on someone else’s mark and take advantage of the significant legal rights, protections, and remedies provided to owners of registered marks.

 

Trademark Registration and “Likelihood of Confusion”
 
Along with patents, copyrights, and trade secrets, trademarks are a form of intellectual property. Trademarks such as company and product names, logos, slogans, and taglines identify and distinguish businesses, goods, and services from others in the marketplace.

 

Like any valuable asset, a trademark requires protection to preserve its value and prevent others from exploiting, damaging, or diminishing it. That is why federal trademark registration is essential for any practice trying to establish itself and its brand.

 

But the USPTO won’t accept every proposed trademark in an application for registration. There are numerous bases for denying a trademark application, but the most fundamental and common reason for denial is because the proposed mark creates a “likelihood of confusion” with another registered mark.

 

When the USPTO receives a trademark application, an attorney at the office will examine the registrability of the proposed mark by, among other things, searching USPTO records to determine whether there is any conflict between the applied-for mark and a mark that is either registered or pending in the USPTO.

 

Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act (the federal law that governs trademarks) provides that the USPTO may refuse to register a mark "which so resembles” a registered or pending mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive…"

 

“Likelihood of confusion” sufficient to deny registration exists when marks are so similar and relate to the same or similar goods or services they are used with that consumers would mistakenly conclude they come from the same source. For example, registering “Apple Dental Associates” is unlikely to be problematic vis-a-vis tech behemoth Apple, but it might be if another dental practice in your area was named “Apple Dentistry.”

 

This is why any practice considering adopting or applying for a new mark should invest in a comprehensive trademark search to look for similar marks before investing the time, money, and effort on a trademark likely to hit the likelihood of confusion wall at the USPTO.

 

The Value of Trademark Registration

 

No law requires you to obtain a federal trademark registration before using a name or logo for your practice. The risk of infringing on someone else’s marks aside, you are free to put your unregistered brand out in the world. But registering your mark with the USPTO provides valuable advantages and is strongly recommended for any practice building its brand. These advantages include:

 

  • Deterrence of infringement. A federally-registered trademark is listed in the publicly available USPTO database of registered and pending trademarks. Seeing that a mark is registered can deter other parties from adopting a confusingly similar mark and reduce the likelihood of infringement.
  • Presumption of ownership. A federal registration creates a legal presumption of ownership of the trademark and the right to use it.
  • Applying before actual use of the mark. You can file a federal trademark application even before publicly using the mark so long as you have a bona fide intent to do so in the future. Filing an application on an "intent to use" basis allows you to get the ball rolling on registering your mark and securing an earlier filing date.
  • Access to federal court. The owner of a registered mark can pursue infringement and other claims in federal court.
  • Use of federal trademark symbols. A federal registration allows an owner to use the federal trademark registration symbol, ®, with the mark, which may act as a deterrent to potential infringers.

 

If you are a dental practice owner and need assistance with trademark searches or registration as part of your efforts to build your brand, please contact Grogan Hesse & Uditsky today at (630) 833-5533 or contact us online to arrange for your free initial consultation.

 

Speak to an Attorney

Related Posts
By Jordan Uditsky February 25, 2026
Why TODAY Is The Time To Prepare Your Practice – and Yourself - For an Uncertain Tomorrow
By Jordan Uditsky February 4, 2026
Bogus ADA Claims Regarding Dental Practice Websites Are Rampant. Your Lawyer Can Help You Tell the Difference Between a Real Problem and a Real Shakedown. Over 25 years have passed since the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) quite literally reshaped the landscape for people with disabilities. From building entrances to parking lots to restrooms to elevators, from hiring and employment opportunities to restaurants, stores, and websites, disabled Americans have far greater access to the same facilities, services, and opportunities as everyone else. Harassment at Best, Extortion at Worst For all the good it has accomplished, however, the ADA has also been abused by opportunistic individuals and attorneys who have used the law in bad faith to shake down small businesses, including dental practices, for alleged violations that have not actually caused any harm or infringed upon any rights afforded by the act. These self-appointed ADA compliance "testers" have filed thousands of nuisance ADA suits that have cost American businesses millions of dollars. According to one analysis, ADA lawsuits have increased by 320% since 2013, with over 4,000 suits filed in 2024 alone. Many plaintiff's law firms file hundreds of cookie-cutter ADA lawsuits each year. One person can visit multiple businesses or websites in a single day solely to identify even the slightest accessibility transgressions in order to generate claims. While these suits can focus on any number of alleged ADA shortcomings, those relating to website accessibility (discussed in detail in this earlier post ) filed by a handful of law firms and serial plaintiffs have earned the scorn of small businesses and practices across the country. That's because these "testers" and the lawyers who represent them specifically target small businesses, as they typically have limited means to defend themselves, may not be able to discern between legitimate and bogus claims, and often see a quick payoff as the path of least resistance. Here’s how the shakedown typically goes down: A plaintiff or their attorney sends the practice a demand letter in which they claim that the practice’s website is inaccessible to people with disabilities (e.g., missing image alt text, inaccessible forms, incompatible with screen readers). They cite a violation of Title III of the ADA. They make a demand for a cash settlement, often ranging from $2,500 to $25,000, alongside a request for accessibility fixes. The business/practice cuts a check in exchange for a release of any ADA claims by that plaintiff related to the website. The business/practice may then receive more demand letters, often from the same firm, on behalf of other plaintiffs who make the same claim, and the extortion continues. Don’t Act Impulsively – Do This Instead All this is not to say that dental practice owners should consider all such claims and demands to be frivolous or ignore their ADA obligations relating to their website. To be sure, a meritorious ADA lawsuit can indeed expose a practice to significant financial and reputational damage. Before reflexively giving in to an ADA demand letter and settling a supposed claim, practice owners should take the following steps: · Don't Panic, But Don't Ignore It. As noted, a demand letter with legalese and ominous language doesn’t mean that you’ve done anything wrong or actually violated the law. While your immediate reaction may include fear, confusion, or anger, don’t act impulsively. By the same token, don’t assume it is a bogus threat; crumble up the letter and throw it in the recycling. Deadlines in these letters are real, and failing to respond appropriately to a viable claim could lead to litigation. · Contact Your Attorney Immediately. This is not a DIY situation. Before responding to the letter or contacting the sender, consult with an attorney experienced in ADA compliance and website accessibility issues. Your lawyer can evaluate the demand letter or complaint, the validity of the claim, and the law firm behind it before formulating an appropriate response. Testers send many cookie-cutter letters that may contain boilerplate allegations of deficiencies that do not actually exist. · Evaluate Your Actual Compliance. Work with your attorney and website accessibility experts to have your website assessed against the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) , which courts often reference in ADA website cases. Understanding your site's actual accessibility helps inform whether settlement, remediation, or another approach makes sense and whether you need to take additional steps to avoid future claims. Keep in mind that this isn't just about legal compliance—it's good business. An accessible website serves all patients better and demonstrates your commitment to inclusivity. If you have questions about your business's ADA obligations and how to protect it from accessibility complaints, please call Grogan, Hesse & Uditsky at (630) 833-5533 or contact us online to arrange for your free initial consultation. At Grogan Hesse & Uditsky, P.C., we focus a substantial part of our practice on providing exceptional legal services for dentists and dental practices, as well as orthodontists, periodontists, endodontists, pediatric dentists, and oral surgeons. We bring unique insights and deep commitment to protecting the interests of dental professionals and their practices and welcome the opportunity to work with you. Jordan Uditsky, an accomplished businessman and seasoned attorney, combines his experience as a legal counselor and successful entrepreneur to advise dentists and other business owners in the Chicago area. Jordan grew up in a dental family, with his father, grandfather, and sister each owning their own dental practices. This blend of legal, business, and personal experience provides Jordan with unique insight into his clients’ needs, concerns, and goals.
Show More
By Jordan Uditsky February 25, 2026
Why TODAY Is The Time To Prepare Your Practice – and Yourself - For an Uncertain Tomorrow
By Jordan Uditsky February 4, 2026
Bogus ADA Claims Regarding Dental Practice Websites Are Rampant. Your Lawyer Can Help You Tell the Difference Between a Real Problem and a Real Shakedown. Over 25 years have passed since the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) quite literally reshaped the landscape for people with disabilities. From building entrances to parking lots to restrooms to elevators, from hiring and employment opportunities to restaurants, stores, and websites, disabled Americans have far greater access to the same facilities, services, and opportunities as everyone else. Harassment at Best, Extortion at Worst For all the good it has accomplished, however, the ADA has also been abused by opportunistic individuals and attorneys who have used the law in bad faith to shake down small businesses, including dental practices, for alleged violations that have not actually caused any harm or infringed upon any rights afforded by the act. These self-appointed ADA compliance "testers" have filed thousands of nuisance ADA suits that have cost American businesses millions of dollars. According to one analysis, ADA lawsuits have increased by 320% since 2013, with over 4,000 suits filed in 2024 alone. Many plaintiff's law firms file hundreds of cookie-cutter ADA lawsuits each year. One person can visit multiple businesses or websites in a single day solely to identify even the slightest accessibility transgressions in order to generate claims. While these suits can focus on any number of alleged ADA shortcomings, those relating to website accessibility (discussed in detail in this earlier post ) filed by a handful of law firms and serial plaintiffs have earned the scorn of small businesses and practices across the country. That's because these "testers" and the lawyers who represent them specifically target small businesses, as they typically have limited means to defend themselves, may not be able to discern between legitimate and bogus claims, and often see a quick payoff as the path of least resistance. Here’s how the shakedown typically goes down: A plaintiff or their attorney sends the practice a demand letter in which they claim that the practice’s website is inaccessible to people with disabilities (e.g., missing image alt text, inaccessible forms, incompatible with screen readers). They cite a violation of Title III of the ADA. They make a demand for a cash settlement, often ranging from $2,500 to $25,000, alongside a request for accessibility fixes. The business/practice cuts a check in exchange for a release of any ADA claims by that plaintiff related to the website. The business/practice may then receive more demand letters, often from the same firm, on behalf of other plaintiffs who make the same claim, and the extortion continues. Don’t Act Impulsively – Do This Instead All this is not to say that dental practice owners should consider all such claims and demands to be frivolous or ignore their ADA obligations relating to their website. To be sure, a meritorious ADA lawsuit can indeed expose a practice to significant financial and reputational damage. Before reflexively giving in to an ADA demand letter and settling a supposed claim, practice owners should take the following steps: · Don't Panic, But Don't Ignore It. As noted, a demand letter with legalese and ominous language doesn’t mean that you’ve done anything wrong or actually violated the law. While your immediate reaction may include fear, confusion, or anger, don’t act impulsively. By the same token, don’t assume it is a bogus threat; crumble up the letter and throw it in the recycling. Deadlines in these letters are real, and failing to respond appropriately to a viable claim could lead to litigation. · Contact Your Attorney Immediately. This is not a DIY situation. Before responding to the letter or contacting the sender, consult with an attorney experienced in ADA compliance and website accessibility issues. Your lawyer can evaluate the demand letter or complaint, the validity of the claim, and the law firm behind it before formulating an appropriate response. Testers send many cookie-cutter letters that may contain boilerplate allegations of deficiencies that do not actually exist. · Evaluate Your Actual Compliance. Work with your attorney and website accessibility experts to have your website assessed against the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) , which courts often reference in ADA website cases. Understanding your site's actual accessibility helps inform whether settlement, remediation, or another approach makes sense and whether you need to take additional steps to avoid future claims. Keep in mind that this isn't just about legal compliance—it's good business. An accessible website serves all patients better and demonstrates your commitment to inclusivity. If you have questions about your business's ADA obligations and how to protect it from accessibility complaints, please call Grogan, Hesse & Uditsky at (630) 833-5533 or contact us online to arrange for your free initial consultation. At Grogan Hesse & Uditsky, P.C., we focus a substantial part of our practice on providing exceptional legal services for dentists and dental practices, as well as orthodontists, periodontists, endodontists, pediatric dentists, and oral surgeons. We bring unique insights and deep commitment to protecting the interests of dental professionals and their practices and welcome the opportunity to work with you. Jordan Uditsky, an accomplished businessman and seasoned attorney, combines his experience as a legal counselor and successful entrepreneur to advise dentists and other business owners in the Chicago area. Jordan grew up in a dental family, with his father, grandfather, and sister each owning their own dental practices. This blend of legal, business, and personal experience provides Jordan with unique insight into his clients’ needs, concerns, and goals.
Show More