Handling Your Office Lease – And Protecting Yourself From Liability - When Selling Your Dental Practice

Jordan Uditsky • October 9, 2024

If you are considering selling your dental practice, you likely want the conclusion of the transaction to be precisely that – conclusive. That is, when the documents are signed and the money changes hands, you want to be able to walk away feeling that nothing will come back to bite you; that all potential claims and liabilities have been accounted for, resolved, or shifted to the purchaser. But if the sale of your practice includes an assignment of your office’s lease, that may be easier said than done.

 

A lease assignment involves transferring the obligations and benefits of the lease from you (the assignor) to the purchaser of your practice (the assignee). There are many complexities to a lease assignment as part of a dental practice sale. Some of those issues may throw a wrench into the sale and prevent its smooth consummation. Others could lead to unwanted or unintended risks after the completion of the deal if not addressed with both the landlord and the lease assignee during the transaction.

 

Here is what dental practice owners who lease rather than own their offices should be cognizant of when assigning their lease during the sale of their practice.

 

What Does The Lease Say About Assignment?

 

As with every other matter pertaining to the landlord-tenant relationship, your rights and limitations as to assignment are governed by the express provisions of the lease. Almost all commercial leases contain a clause that accounts for the possibility that the tenant will want or need to assign their lease to another party during the lease term.

 

Some leases – hopefully not yours - explicitly prohibit assignment. However, it is far more common for a lease to allow for assignment so long as certain conditions are met. Those conditions usually involve obtaining the lessor’s consent to the assignment. How freely that consent will be given depends both on lease terms that may define how and why the landlord may approve or deny the proposed assignment as well as the finesse with which the tenant and their assignee approach the landlord during negotiations. 

 

Obtaining The Landlord’s Consent to Assignment

 

If the lease requires your landlord’s approval for assignment, how your putative assignee handles this aspect of the process can make or break your practice sale.

 

Since the purchaser will be using the space in the same manner and for the same purposes as your practice did, the landlord’s primary, if not exclusive, concern is ensuring that the new tenant will be able to meet all of its obligations under the lease. Since no obligation means more to the landlord than getting their rent payments, reassuring them that the lessee has the financial wherewithal to do so consistently and throughout the lease term is critical.

 

To expedite this process, you should work with the purchaser to gather the information, documents, statements, business plans, and references that can provide a clear financial history and strong business case for the assignee’s assumption of the lease. Doing so transparently and affirmatively can help reassure the landlord and potentially smooth over any concerns they may have.

 

During negotiations, the landlord may ask for changes to the lease or additional guarantees. For example, the landlord may require a personal guarantee from the assignee or request changes in rent rates or other lease terms. These negotiations are a normal part of the process, but they can lead to delays or complications if not handled properly.

 

The Landlord Isn’t The Only One Who Cares About The Assignee’s Finances

 

You have just as much interest in the purchaser’s ability to meet its lease obligations as your landlord does. Assigning a lease to a financially unstable buyer could lead to complications down the line, especially if you remain liable for breaches of the lease after the assignment.

 

And there is a good chance that you will, in fact, still be on the hook for any failure of the purchaser to fulfill the lease terms. While you should attempt to negotiate for and obtain a release of liability from the landlord, they may not be amenable to providing you with one. In such a situation, you essentially become the purchaser’s surety and guarantor as to the lease, an undesirable arrangement, to say the least.

 

There are a couple of ways you can protect yourself in the event that the landlord will not release you from liability. You could make the sale of your practice contingent on obtaining a release, but if you do so, you are essentially giving your landlord the ability to scuttle your exit plans. Alternatively, you can make sure that your sale agreement contains a strong indemnification provision such that you can recover from the purchaser any amounts you may have to pay to the landlord due to the purchaser’s breach of the lease, including any attorney’s fees you may incur.

 

Timing and Closing the Transaction

 

The timing of the lease assignment is also critical. The lease should be assigned at the time the practice sale is completed, but the process of obtaining landlord approval and negotiating lease terms can take several weeks or even months. Both the buyer and seller should plan for these delays and ensure that the sale agreement takes the lease assignment timeline into account.

 

Finalizing the lease assignment at the same time as the practice sale ensures a smooth transition and avoids disruptions in operations and patient care. The lease should be legally assigned, and all required documents should be signed and executed before the sale is officially closed.

 

To discuss the potential sale of your dental practice, including any issues related to an assignment of your lease, please contact Grogan Hesse & Uditsky today at (630) 833-5533 or contact us online to arrange for your free initial consultation.

 

We focus a substantial part of our practice on providing exceptional legal services for dentists and dental practices, as well as orthodontists, periodontists, endodontists, pediatric dentists, and oral surgeons. We bring unique insights and deep commitment to protecting the interests of dental professionals and their practices and welcome the opportunity to work with you.

 

Jordan Uditsky, an accomplished businessman and seasoned attorney, combines his experience as a legal counselor and successful entrepreneur to advise dentists and other business owners in the Chicago area. Jordan grew up in a dental family, with his father, grandfather, and sister each owning their own dental practices, and this blend of legal, business, and personal experience provides Jordan with unique insight into his clients’ needs, concerns, and goals.  


Speak to an Attorney

Related Posts
By Jordan Uditsky April 15, 2026
How Defining Your Goals Will Shape Your Dental Practice’s Business Succession Plan
By Jordan Uditsky April 2, 2026
How Buy-Sell Agreements Determine the Success of Your Transition
A doctor is sitting at a desk talking to a patient.
By Jordan Uditsky March 9, 2026
Most relationships, whether personal or professional, start with a certain level of mutual trust and respect, compatibility, and shared goals and priorities. But those characteristics don’t always last, and a once-promising partnership can devolve into disputes, distrust, or outright hostility. The dentist-patient relationship is not immune to such deterioration. There may come a day when the differences between a dentist and their patient make continued treatment undesirable or impractical. A patient, of course, is free to call it quits with their dentist at any time, or the patient and dentist can mutually agree to part ways. But when a dentist wants to stop treating a problematic or disruptive patient and terminate the relationship, things can be a bit stickier. It is crucial that a dentist handles the break-up carefully and in accordance with the law and ethical standards so as to avoid claims of patient abandonment that could threaten their professional license or expose them to liability. Are you interested in speaking with one of our attorneys? Click here to contact us now. Dentists Have a Right To Unilaterally Dismiss a Patient For Reasonable Cause As a preliminary matter, dentists may choose to responsibly end their relationship with a patient for any reasonable, legally permissible cause. As the American Dental Association (ADA) guidelines put it: The dentist has the right to dismiss a patient in situations where it is impossible to resolve differences or if the dentist cannot abide the patient’s behavior within the practice, as long as the dismissal is not for a legally impermissible discriminatory reason. Accordingly, a dentist may not end a patient relationship because of the patient’s race, religion, gender, color, age, national origin, disability, or other characteristics protected by federal and state anti-discrimination laws. Notably, political opinions are not a protected characteristic under the law. Common reasons a dentist may justifiably terminate a patient include: Hostility or abusive behavior toward the dentist, staff, or other patients Harassment or sexual abuse of dentist, staff, or other patients Repeatedly missing appointments Refusal to undergo recommended testing or treatment Lack of trust or confidence in the dentist’s abilities or recommendations Consistent failure to follow office policies Showing up to appointments under the influence of alcohol or drugs Refusing to adhere to infection-control precautions and policies, such as masking Nonpayment Patient Dismissal vs. Patient Abandonment A dentist who chooses to dismiss a patient can’t simply show them the door, send them a break-up text, or refuse to answer their calls. Dentists must end the relationship such that they avoid any claim that they have abandoned their patient. According to the ADA’s Principles of Ethics and Code of Professional Conduct Section 2.F.: Once a dentist has undertaken a course of treatment, the dentist should not discontinue that treatment without giving the patient adequate notice and the opportunity to obtain the services of another dentist. Care should be taken that the patient’s oral health is not jeopardized in the process. Patient abandonment is a serious ethical violation. For example, the Illinois Dental Practice Act lists “abandonment of a patient” as one of the many reasons the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation may revoke, suspend, refuse to issue or renew, reprimand, or take other disciplinary or non-disciplinary action against a dentist. A dentist also exposes themself to a malpractice claim if injuries result from their termination of the patient at the wrong time during the course of treatment or without proper notice. Best Practices For Terminating a Patient Relationship As noted, adequate notice, providing the patient an opportunity to find alternative care, and facilitating continuity of ongoing care are the keys to responsibly ending the dentist-patient relationship and avoiding a claim of abandonment. We suggest that dentists take the following steps to minimize the likelihood of any disputes or claims arising from the termination of the relationship: provide written notice to the patient, preferably by certified mail; provide the patient with the reasons for terminating the relationship; offer to continue treatment and access to services for a reasonable period (such as 30 days) to allow the patient to secure another dentist’s services; state that you will provide emergency services for a designated period; help the patient locate another dentist; and offer to transfer the patient’s records to a new dentist and/or advise the patient of their right to obtain a copy of their records for a fee. Additionally, a dentist experiencing issues with a patient should contemporaneously document all communications, incidents, statements, or behavior suggesting a breakdown in the relationship. Of course, while a dentist can control how they handle the end of a patient relationship, they can’t control how the patient will react to being “dumped.” Even when the dentist acts professionally and cordially, as they should, there is no guarantee that the patient will do the same. If a patient responds with hostility or anger, tread carefully and do not respond in kind. Contact Us With Any Questions or Concerns If you have any questions or concerns about ending a patient relationship, please give us a call. At Grogan, Hesse & Uditsky, P.C., we focus a substantial part of our practice on providing exceptional legal services for dentists and dental practices, as well as orthodontists, periodontists, endodontists, pediatric dentists, and oral surgeons. We bring unique insights and deep commitment to protecting the interests of dental professionals and their practices and welcome the opportunity to work with you. Please call us at (630) 833-5533 or contact us online to arrange for your free initial consultation. Jordan Uditsky, an accomplished businessman and seasoned attorney, combines his experience as a legal counselor and successful entrepreneur to advise dentists and other business owners in the Chicago area. Jordan grew up in a dental family, with his father, grandfather, and sister each owning their own dental practices, and this blend of legal, business, and personal experience provides Jordan with unique insight into his clients’ needs, concerns, and goals.
Show More
By Jordan Uditsky April 15, 2026
How Defining Your Goals Will Shape Your Dental Practice’s Business Succession Plan
By Jordan Uditsky April 2, 2026
How Buy-Sell Agreements Determine the Success of Your Transition
A doctor is sitting at a desk talking to a patient.
By Jordan Uditsky March 9, 2026
Most relationships, whether personal or professional, start with a certain level of mutual trust and respect, compatibility, and shared goals and priorities. But those characteristics don’t always last, and a once-promising partnership can devolve into disputes, distrust, or outright hostility. The dentist-patient relationship is not immune to such deterioration. There may come a day when the differences between a dentist and their patient make continued treatment undesirable or impractical. A patient, of course, is free to call it quits with their dentist at any time, or the patient and dentist can mutually agree to part ways. But when a dentist wants to stop treating a problematic or disruptive patient and terminate the relationship, things can be a bit stickier. It is crucial that a dentist handles the break-up carefully and in accordance with the law and ethical standards so as to avoid claims of patient abandonment that could threaten their professional license or expose them to liability. Are you interested in speaking with one of our attorneys? Click here to contact us now. Dentists Have a Right To Unilaterally Dismiss a Patient For Reasonable Cause As a preliminary matter, dentists may choose to responsibly end their relationship with a patient for any reasonable, legally permissible cause. As the American Dental Association (ADA) guidelines put it: The dentist has the right to dismiss a patient in situations where it is impossible to resolve differences or if the dentist cannot abide the patient’s behavior within the practice, as long as the dismissal is not for a legally impermissible discriminatory reason. Accordingly, a dentist may not end a patient relationship because of the patient’s race, religion, gender, color, age, national origin, disability, or other characteristics protected by federal and state anti-discrimination laws. Notably, political opinions are not a protected characteristic under the law. Common reasons a dentist may justifiably terminate a patient include: Hostility or abusive behavior toward the dentist, staff, or other patients Harassment or sexual abuse of dentist, staff, or other patients Repeatedly missing appointments Refusal to undergo recommended testing or treatment Lack of trust or confidence in the dentist’s abilities or recommendations Consistent failure to follow office policies Showing up to appointments under the influence of alcohol or drugs Refusing to adhere to infection-control precautions and policies, such as masking Nonpayment Patient Dismissal vs. Patient Abandonment A dentist who chooses to dismiss a patient can’t simply show them the door, send them a break-up text, or refuse to answer their calls. Dentists must end the relationship such that they avoid any claim that they have abandoned their patient. According to the ADA’s Principles of Ethics and Code of Professional Conduct Section 2.F.: Once a dentist has undertaken a course of treatment, the dentist should not discontinue that treatment without giving the patient adequate notice and the opportunity to obtain the services of another dentist. Care should be taken that the patient’s oral health is not jeopardized in the process. Patient abandonment is a serious ethical violation. For example, the Illinois Dental Practice Act lists “abandonment of a patient” as one of the many reasons the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation may revoke, suspend, refuse to issue or renew, reprimand, or take other disciplinary or non-disciplinary action against a dentist. A dentist also exposes themself to a malpractice claim if injuries result from their termination of the patient at the wrong time during the course of treatment or without proper notice. Best Practices For Terminating a Patient Relationship As noted, adequate notice, providing the patient an opportunity to find alternative care, and facilitating continuity of ongoing care are the keys to responsibly ending the dentist-patient relationship and avoiding a claim of abandonment. We suggest that dentists take the following steps to minimize the likelihood of any disputes or claims arising from the termination of the relationship: provide written notice to the patient, preferably by certified mail; provide the patient with the reasons for terminating the relationship; offer to continue treatment and access to services for a reasonable period (such as 30 days) to allow the patient to secure another dentist’s services; state that you will provide emergency services for a designated period; help the patient locate another dentist; and offer to transfer the patient’s records to a new dentist and/or advise the patient of their right to obtain a copy of their records for a fee. Additionally, a dentist experiencing issues with a patient should contemporaneously document all communications, incidents, statements, or behavior suggesting a breakdown in the relationship. Of course, while a dentist can control how they handle the end of a patient relationship, they can’t control how the patient will react to being “dumped.” Even when the dentist acts professionally and cordially, as they should, there is no guarantee that the patient will do the same. If a patient responds with hostility or anger, tread carefully and do not respond in kind. Contact Us With Any Questions or Concerns If you have any questions or concerns about ending a patient relationship, please give us a call. At Grogan, Hesse & Uditsky, P.C., we focus a substantial part of our practice on providing exceptional legal services for dentists and dental practices, as well as orthodontists, periodontists, endodontists, pediatric dentists, and oral surgeons. We bring unique insights and deep commitment to protecting the interests of dental professionals and their practices and welcome the opportunity to work with you. Please call us at (630) 833-5533 or contact us online to arrange for your free initial consultation. Jordan Uditsky, an accomplished businessman and seasoned attorney, combines his experience as a legal counselor and successful entrepreneur to advise dentists and other business owners in the Chicago area. Jordan grew up in a dental family, with his father, grandfather, and sister each owning their own dental practices, and this blend of legal, business, and personal experience provides Jordan with unique insight into his clients’ needs, concerns, and goals.
Show More